By Cary Wright, VP Product Management, Endace
Weak security plagues far too many of the IT products we use today. The problem is, there is no unified mandate to compel vendors to invest in security hardening their products. Vendors are free to choose how heavily to invest in security. So it’s no surprise that many vendors don’t invest heavily enough in thoroughly security hardening their products.
However, in many industries – such as Government, defense or critical infrastructure – the potential impact of a security vulnerability in a product is just too serious for organizations to leave it to vendors to decide how to secure their products. For this reason, organizations in many of these industries mandate that vendors must submit their products to rigorous testing and certification processes to ensure the security of their products is iron clad.
At Endace we found out first-hand how difficult and rigorous these standards are to comply with. The effort took us the better part of a year and significant investment in software development, testing and validation, and certification. Armor plated security is a good way to describe what these standards require. Our recent OSm 7.2.1 release includes everything we had to do to comply with these standards.
The good news for customers – regardless of the industry you are in – is that this rigorous testing and validation process doesn’t just benefit Government, Defense and critical infrastructure organizations. Any organization that adopts products that have passed these certification processes can be confident those products have been independently evaluated to minimize the risk of security vulnerabilities and are fit-for-purpose for deployment in high-security environments.
By selecting a product with DoD level security compliance you reap the benefit of millions of dollars of investment in security testing and hardening that goes way beyond standard penetration tests and security scans. The testing process for each of these certifications involves delving deep into the product – comprehensive testing, source code reviews, and independent validation that the security controls of the product are robust and well designed.
What are these standards, and what do they test?
Complying with FIPS 140-3 is the fundamental first step in certification. FIPS mandates that products must use robust and secure encryption. This is not a bolt-on. Products must implement a validated cryptography module as a central software pillar to ensure all encrypted communications meet the NIST standard for strong cryptography, including HTTPS, SSL, and SSH.Just including encrypted HDDs in a system – as some vendors do to claim compliance with FIPS – is not sufficient. Every communication to and from the system must be secured with FIPS validated cryptography before the system can be FIPS certified. Independent testing confirms that products comply with the FIPS standards.
NIAP NDcPP 2.2e, also known as Common Criteria, is an international standard agreed by 18 nations. It builds on FIPS to define security requirements that are expected to be implemented by all network devices. It goes extremely deep to validate a product has robust security. By deep, I mean months of extensive testing, inspection, and independent code reviews, conducted and signed off by government signatories who are usually security experts in defense departments.
DoDIN APL stands for the US Department of Defense Information Network Approved Products List. With FIPS and NIAP certification in hand and a US DoD sponsor, a vendor’s final step is undergo product testing by a US DoD lab against DoD cybersecurity requirements. Being listed on the APL is the last big stage of a long and intensive project but it’s not the end of the story. Ongoing maintenance and revalidation ensures that a product remains secure throughout its life.
