Episode #67 Erik Dove from Cisco talks Agentic SOC and Security Operations

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In the Packet Forensic Files, Episode 67, Michael talks to Cisco’s Erik Dove.

By Michael Morris, Senior Director of Global Business Development, Endace


How Agentic AI is changing Security Operations.

Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping Security Operations Centers (SOCs), helping security teams investigate incidents faster while reducing alert fatigue. But as AI becomes more capable, what role do human analysts and packet data play in an increasingly automated SOC?

In Packet Forensics Files Episode 67, I sit down with Cisco Security Sales Engineer and Incident Response expert Erik Dove to discuss how Agentic AI is changing incident response, where packet data fits into modern SOC workflows, and why experienced analysts remain essential.

Erik’s first point was that AI’s biggest benefit isn’t simply speed. It’s improving the accuracy of incident triage. By helping analysts identify which alerts genuinely deserve attention, AI reduces time spent on false positives and lets teams focus on real threats.

He also explained that effective AI starts with strong foundations. Organizations need clear priorities and service level agreements so AI can accurately identify the alerts that matter most.

We explored where always-on packet capture fits into an AI-assisted SOC. While SIEMs, XDR platforms and firewalls all provide valuable telemetry, packet data gives investigators the evidence to validate alerts, reconstruct communications and build accurate timelines. Rather than relying solely on logs, analysts can quickly determine whether activity is truly malicious and understand the “why” behind an alert.

One of my favourite parts of the discussion was Erik’s perspective on the future role of analysts. Rather than replacing people, he sees AI acting as a team of specialists that can summarize incidents, assist investigations, support orchestration and document findings. Human judgement remains essential because cybersecurity investigations still require context, experience and decision-making that AI cannot provide on its own.

To wrap up, I asked Erik what a fully optimized Agentic AI SOC might look like. He compared modern investigations to Law & Order. The tools continue to improve and the cases become more complex, but investigators still rely on evidence. In cybersecurity, those digital fingerprints are preserved in packet data, giving analysts the visibility they need to understand exactly what happened.

If you’re interested in how AI, automation and packet capture are shaping the future of security operations, I encourage you to watch the full episode. It’s a fascinating discussion with plenty of practical advice for organizations looking to build more effective SOCs.

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here, or on your favorite podcast platform.


Episode #66 Cody Spooner from Corelight talks Incident Response and Threat Hunting

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In the Packet Forensic Files, Episode 66, Michael talks to Corelight’s Cody Spooner.

By Michael Morris, Senior Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

The Increasing Complexity of Incident Response
and Threat Hunting

In this episode of the Endace Packet Forensic Files, I sat down with Cody Spooner, Principal Sales Engineer and DFIR expert at Corelight, to discuss a really interesting topic: the subtleties and differences of “Enablers” vs “Behaviors” of a cybersecurity compromise.

Cody explains that when most people think of threat hunting or incident response investigations, they picture analysts looking for signs of malicious activity. In reality there are critical subtle differences between the “behavior of a compromise” and the underlying “enabler of a compromise” that often go unnoticed or overlooked. He highlights how organizations tend to focus heavily on detecting malicious behaviors – such as data exfiltration or unauthorized logins – but often miss identifying the enabling conditions – such as misconfigurations or legacy protocols – that led to those compromises in the first place.

Cody shares examples of seemingly harmless issues that can become the doorway to a full compromise, such as configuration issues or outdated or deprecated protocols like NTLMv1 and SMBv1. These often persist in modern environments and Cody suggests that incident responders and threat hunters can usefully focus on identifying and eliminating these enablers to reduce the organisation’s risk profile.

Cody gives advice for security teams on how to shift their mindset from focusing only on behaviors to focusing on enablers as well in their threat hunting activity. He also provides insights into how IR teams should interpret and contextualize indicators of compromise and discusses how the “why” behind an attack can often change or influence the response strategy.

Finally, Cody shares his thoughts on what emerging technologies or architectural trends will create new classes of enablers that defenders need to start paying attention to now.

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Episode #65 Andrew Cook from Recon Infosec discusses Incident Response and Threat Hunting

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In the Packet Forensic Files, Episode 65, Michael talks to Andrew Cook, CTO at Recon InfoSec and host of the Thursday Defensive Webcast.

By Michael Morris, Senior Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

The Increasing Complexity of Incident Response
and Threat Hunting

In this episode of The Packet Forensic Files, I’m joined by Andrew Cook, CTO of Recon InfoSec – an Air Force cybersecurity veteran and seasoned DFIR expert – to discuss what it really takes to investigate and respond to today’s most complex cyber incidents.

Drawing from his years of frontline experience handling major breaches and ransomware events, Andrew shares how real-world incidents have reshaped his investigative mindset. One area he starts with is the “human impact” of working through a security incident.  Cyber breaches have impacts on people who may experience guilt for having been the one who clicked on that phishing email, or anxiety and stress for the people who are trying to quickly defend, investigate, and remediate a breach to get their company back online.  Their experiences are not unlike those of crime victims on the street. Or first responders facing high-pressure situations.

We walked through Andrew’s incident response workflow, focusing on the steps he considers most critical when time, clarity, and confidence are most important. He talks about the importance of “timelining” to accurately build a timeline of evidence, events, and data to fully understand the breadth and depth of a breach.

Andrew shares some of his tools of choice for incident response investigations when he doesn’t have the luxury of his company’s full security stack. He gives examples of how packet data, when combined with endpoint logs, SIEM alerts, and threat intelligence, enables investigators to build a far more complete and defensible picture of incidents. Packet-level visibility, in particular, remains a cornerstone of high-fidelity investigations—often revealing attacker behavior, lateral movement, or data exfiltration activity that traditional logs and other telemetry may miss.

We also explored how different types of incidents should be prioritized and categorized to ensure the right resources are applied at the right time. Andrew highlighted the need for clear decision-making frameworks that balance technical severity, business impact, and regulatory considerations.  He talks through the concept of thinking about the potential risks and thinking backward from that outcome of what would be needed to prevent or solve that problem as you build and design your SOC architectures.

Looking ahead, Andrew shares his perspective on emerging trends shaping digital forensics and incident response, including the increasing sophistication of adversaries, growing data volumes, and how leveraging AI can help SOC analysts make sense of the complexity. Ensuring forensic rigor while meeting regulatory and legal requirements remains a non-negotiable aspect of modern DFIR work.

Finally, Andrew shares what he thinks is key to look out for over the next 6–18 months: Attackers using AI-assistance to leverage threat vectors – for example using application extensions – that drive data loss. And AI plugins given access to sensitive data that are leveraging prompt injections and PowerShell programs to compromise environments.  The sophistication of threat actors with the help of AI is only getting more advanced.

PFF Ep 65 Andrew Cook, Recon Infosec

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Episode #64 with Steve Fink talking about building next-Gen SOCs with AI, automation, and resilience

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In the Packet Forensic Files, Episode 64, Michael talks to Steve “Fink”, CTO and CISO at Secure Yeti

By Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

Building Next-Gen SOCs with AI, Automation, and Resilience

In this episode of The Packet Forensic Files, I’m joined by Steve “Fink” Fink, CTO and CISO at Secure Yeti, and the mastermind behind the Security Operations Centers (SOCs) and Networks Operations Centers (NOCs) that power some of the biggest cybersecurity events in the world, including Black Hat, RSA Conference, and Cisco Live.

With more than 26 years in cybersecurity, beginning with pen-testing the FBI, Fink has built and operated some of the most complex SOCs in the world. He shared his insights into what it takes to design resilient, scalable, and future-ready security environments.

It All Starts with the Packets

Fink believes that true visibility begins at the packet level:

“If you don’t have the context of your network, it’s almost impossible to conduct a valid investigation or build an effective response plan.”

By combining full packet capture with contextual data and up-to-date asset inventories, analysts gain the visibility necessary to detect and respond in real-time.

Automation, AI, and Resilience

At Secure Yeti, Fink has automated nearly every SOC function up to Tier 4 using agentic AI, handling over 97% of the workload. This automation enables scalability, consistency, and around-the-clock response, freeing human analysts to focus on higher-level investigations.

Resilience is also a core design principle. Fink ensures redundancy at every level, emphasizing that even if one component fails, “the whole thing shouldn’t descend into chaos.”

Collaboration and Interoperability

At events like Black Hat and RSA, Fink brings together traditionally competing vendors, from firewalls and SIEMs to XDR and packet capture platforms, to collaborate within a single SOC. That cooperation, he says, fuels product innovation and real-world interoperability.

At Endace, we share Fink’s philosophy that packets provide the ultimate source of truth for understanding what’s happening on the network and driving smarter, faster investigations.

Don’t miss this episode as Fink shares how operational excellence and AI-driven security are being redefined.

PFF Ep 64 Steve Fink Video Thumbnail

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Endace Packet Forensics Files: Episode #63

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In Episode 63, Michael talks to Jack Chan, Vice President, Product Management at Fortinet

By Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

Why NDR is Evolving—And What Enterprises Should Demand From It

In this episode of The Packet Forensic Files, I spoke with Jack Chan, VP of Product and Field CTO at Fortinet, about what sets a strong Network Detection and Response (NDR) solution apart. Jack explained that while many vendors claim to offer NDR, the best solutions help security teams see deep into their networks, spot threats early, and look back in time to understand what really happened before and after an incident.

Jack pointed out that most companies already have too many security tools creating alerts. That’s why it’s so important for NDR to work well with other tools like EDR—so SOC teams know which alerts really matter. He also shared how AI and machine learning are helping to detect threats even in encrypted traffic, and how newer tech like generative AI is making it easier for analysts to investigate issues without writing complex queries.

We talked about the benefits of using NDR alongside firewalls. Since NDR is passive, it can show you how clean or risky your network is without disrupting anything. But when NDR spots a threat, teams need to decide—should it trigger an automatic response or wait for human approval? Jack recommends using automation carefully, with some human oversight.

Finally, Jack reminded us that technology alone isn’t enough. Security starts with people—whether it’s developers writing secure code or staff avoiding risky clicks. No matter how advanced your tools are, the human factor still plays a huge role in keeping networks safe.

Don’t miss this episode as Jack shares practical tips, real-world examples, and a clear-eyed view of where the NDR space is heading.

 

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Endace Packet Forensics Files: Episode #62

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In Episode 62, Michael talks to Jessica (Bair) Oppenheimer, Cisco’s Director of Security Operations

By Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

What does it take to run a world-class Security Operations Center (SOC) in today’s high-stakes, high-speed cybersecurity landscape?

In this episode of the Packet Forensic Files, I talk with Jessica (Bair) Oppenheimer, Cisco’s Director of Security Operations, for an in-depth look at next-generation Security Operations Centers (SOCs). Jessica shares her expertise from securing high-stakes events like the Paris 2024 Summer Olympics, the NFL Super Bowl, Black Hat, Cisco Live and RSAC Conferences, as well as years of experience at Guidance Software, ThreatGrid and Cisco.

I asked Jessica what differentiates the “next gen” SOC from traditional SOC models. She talks about some of the “high-visibility “SOCs that she’s been working with as part of the Cisco Security Operations team, and her experience bringing together highly-skilled people from multiple organizations, keeping them motivated, equipping them with all the tools and telemetry they need, so they can collaborate and innovate.

Jessica talks about why people, innovation, and smart use of AI as an enabler for SOC teams are critical to creating an agile and responsive SOC team. She sees AI’s key role is in speeding up analysis, detection, and threat-hunting, and providing analysts with detailed context around incidents so they can make informed decisions more quickly. It can also help analysts to quickly build automation tasks in response to threats they’re seeing so they can respond faster. That makes analysts more productive and effective, and in turn frees them up to do more proactive threat hunting like investigating some of the less obvious signals that might indicate potentially serious threats.

This episode is a must-watch for cybersecurity professionals who want to stay ahead of evolving threats – particularly those in security operations. It is jam-packed with insights on balancing automation with human expertise and establishing the key KPIs for SOC success.

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Endace Packet Forensics Files: Episode #61

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In Episode 61, Michael talks to JP Bergeaux, Federal CTO at GuidePoint Security

By Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

In my latest episode of the Endace Packet Forensic Files, I sit down with Jean-Paul (JP) Bergeaux, Federal CTO for GuidePoint Security, to explore federal cybersecurity. Our conversation dives into the challenges, technologies, and approaches reshaping how government agencies protect their digital infrastructure.

The critical importance of certifications like FIPS 140 and NIAP becomes clear. These aren’t bureaucratic checkboxes–they’re safeguards that ensure the reliability and security of technological solutions across federal networks. JP’s insights show how these standards help maintain the integrity of government systems.

The M-21-31 directives also emerge as a game-changer. Introduced in repsonse to the SolarWinds breach, these guidelines are transforming how agencies approach network forensics. Packet capture (PCAP) data is now considered the gold standard for threat detection, providing what JP calls “ground truth” in cybersecurity investigations. The real-world examples he shares are particularly compelling, especially cases where PCAP data reveals hidden threats.

We also tackle the challenges posed by generative AI. JP describes the “generative AI arms race”, where threat actors innovate rapidly, while government agencies must proceed with caution. It’s a balance between innovation and security that will define cybersecurity’s future.

One thing is clear from our conversation: the federal cybersecurity landscape is dynamic and demanding. Reactive security models are giving way to proactive approaches that integrate security across every layer of infrastructure.

Don’t miss this episode as JP shared valuable  insights into the front lines of federal cybersecurity and the tools, policies, and mindsets needed to stay ahead.

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.


Endace Packet Forensics Files: Episode #60

Original Entry by : Michael Morris

In our 60th Episode, Michael talks to James Spiteri, Director of Product Management for Security Analytics at Elastic

By Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace


Michael Morris, Director of Global Business Development, Endace

It’s my pleasure to welcome James Spiteri from Elastic for this 60th Episode of the Packet Forensics Files. It’s a great milestone to have reached, and the series continues to grow in popularity – thanks to people like James who have joined me to share their valuable expertise and advice.

In this episode James brings a wealth of experience, having worked in cybersecurity and security operations for many years. From leading SOC teams to developing advanced solutions for generative AI and machine learning, his expertise is second to none.

We dive into the evolving landscape of nation-state cybersecurity threats. According to James, these attacks are highly sophisticated, leveraging bespoke malware, supply chain compromises, and cloud infrastructure. For SIEM vendors, this means platforms must provide comprehensive visibility and support diverse data sources to detect these threats effectively. Modern techniques like entity analytics, user behavior monitoring, and generative AI are essential in addressing these challenges.

Evolving cybersecurity regulations like GDPR and DORA demand effective data management and integrity. James highlights the role of AI in simplifying these processes, from validating data to automating complex tasks like incident reporting. Additionally, integrating SIEMs with legacy systems in critical infrastructure requires creative solutions, such as monitoring network events around outdated devices, to maintain visibility.

As we look to the future, James underscores the transformative role of generative AI in cybersecurity, both as a tool for defending against attacks and a potential weapon in the hands of cybercriminals. By staying ahead of these trends and embracing innovation, SIEM vendors can ensure organizations are better equipped to tackle the sophisticated threats of tomorrow.

Don’t miss this essential conversation—tune in for expert insights on how to fortify your defenses in the face of an increasingly complex cyber landscape.

Other episodes in the Secure Networks video/audio podcast series are available here. Or listen to the podcast here or on your favorite podcast platform.